BLOCKING OF CONDITIONED SUPPRESSION: ROLE OF THE FIRST COMPOUND TRIAL.MACKINTOSH NJ.1975; J. EXPER. PSYCHOL. ANIMAL BEHAV. PROCESS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 1; NO 4; PP. 335-345; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

OVERSHADOWING AND STIMULUS INTENSITY.MACKINTOSH NJ.1976; ANIMAL LEARNG BAHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 4; NO 2; PP. 186-192; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF ANIMAL LEARNINGMACKINTOSH NJ.1974; LONDON; ACAD. PRESS; DA. 1974; PP. (744P.); BIBL. DISSEM; ISBN 0124646506Book

A THEORY OF ATTENTION: VARIATIONS IN THE ASSOCIABILITY OF STIMULI WITH REINFORCEMENTMACKINTOSH NJ.1975; PSYCHOL. REV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 82; NO 4; PP. 276-298; BIBL. 2P.1/2Article

CONTROL BY AN IRRELEVANT STIMULUS IN DISCRETE-TRIAL DISCRIMINATION LEARNING IN PIGEONS = LE CONTROLE PAR UN STIMULUS NON PERTINENT DANS LE CAS DE L'APPRENTISSAGE DE DISCRIMINATION AVEC ESSAIS DISCRETS CHEZ LE PIGEONGRAY VA; MACKINTOSH NJ.1973; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1973; VOL. 1; NO 3; PP. 193-195; BIBL. 5REF.Article

BLOCKING OF FIRST- AND SECOND ORDER AUTOSHAPING IN PIGEONSLEYLAND CM; MACKINTOSH NJ.1978; ANIMAL LEARNG BEHAV.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 6; NO 4; PP. 391-394; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

THE CONTROL OF APPETITIVE INSTRUMENTAL RESPONDING DOES NOT DEPEND ON CLASSICAL CONDITIONING TO THE DISCRIMINATIVE STIMULUSHOLMAN JG; MACKINTOSH NJ.1981; Q. J. EXP. PSYCHOL., SECT. B, COMP. PHYSIOL. PSYCHOL.; GBR; DA. 1981; VOL. 33; NO 1; PP. 21-31; BIBL. 2 P.Article

CLASSICAL CONDITIONING IN ANIMALS.DICKINSON A; MACKINTOSH NJ.1978; ANNU. REV. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1978; VOL. 29; PP. 587-612; BIBL. 8 P.Article

EXCITATORY AND INHIBITORY CONDITIONING FOLLOWING UNCORRELATED PRESENTATIONS OF CS AND UCS.BAKER AG; MACKINTOSH NJ.1977; ANIMAL LEARNG BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 5; NO 3; PP. 315-319; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

INHIBITORY CONDITIONING RESULTING FROM A REDUCTION IN THE MAGNITUDE OF REINFORCEMENTCOTTON MM; GOODALL G; MACKINTOSH NJ et al.1982; Q. J. EXP. PSYCHOL., SECT. B, COMP. PHYSIOL. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0272-4995; GBR; DA. 1982; VOL. 34; NO 3; PP. 163-180; BIBL. 1 P.Article

OVERSHADOWING OF A STIMULUS-REINFORCER ASSOCIATION BY AN INSTRUMENTAL RESPONSEGARRUD P; GOODALL G; MACKINTOSH NJ et al.1981; Q. J. EXP. PSYCHOL., SECT. B, COMP. PHYSIOL. PSYCHOL.; GBR; DA. 1981; VOL. 33; NO 2; PP. 123-135; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

LOCUS OF THE EFFECT OF A SURPRISING REINFORCER IN THE ATTENUATION OF BLOCKING.MACKINTOSH NJ; BYGRAVE DJ; PICTON BMB et al.1977; QUART. J. EXPER. PSYCHOL.; G.B.; DA. 1977; VOL. 29; NO 2; PP. 327-336; BIBL. 9 REF.Article